Policy Toolkit Home
Alternative Certification
 Articulation & Transfer
 AAT
 Common Core
 2 + 2
 Common Numbering Sys.
 Key Issues
-  Policy Context
-  State Examples
-  Sources & Links
Baccalaureate Options
Paraprofessionals

Useful Tools for Articulation & Transfer
Policy Briefs
Quick Facts
State Profiles
Charts & Graphs
Glossary     

> Toolkit Home > Articulation & Transfer > Common Numbering Systems > Key Issues

Key Issues

Time and Effort
While common course numbering systems significantly contribute to the ease of student transfer between different institutions across a state, developing such a system requires considerable coordination with representative institutions and, particularly, discipline-based faculty groups. A significant obstacle to the expansion of such programs is the faculty time required to negotiate transfer policies, course-to-course equivalencies and related articulation issues. This is especially true when major requirements differ widely at four-year institutions across a region or state.

Academic Traditions of Faculty Autonomy
Traditions of faculty autonomy over coursework are deep-seated and highly valued, particularly at research institutions. Faculty groups often resist mandated common course description and numbering systems as a threat to academic freedom and a blow to quality.



This site was made possible by a Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers to Use Technology (PT3) grant from the U.S. Dept. of Education.



© 2006 The Center for Community College Policy
Education Commission of the States
700 Broadway, #1200  |  Denver, Colorado 80203-3460
303.299.3600  |  Fax: 303.296.8332  |  Email: ecs@ecs.org  |  www.communitycollegepolicy.org
Policy Issues  |  State Files  |  Meetings & Workshops 
Publications  |  About Us  |  Other Resources